The mental illness industry frames mental health in terms of individual pathology, diagnosis, and personal responsibility. It focuses on what’s wrong with a person: what disorder they might have, what cognitive distortions they carry, what behaviors need changing. It tends to isolate the person from their context and assume the problem lies within, in the brain, the thoughts, the “maladaptive” behaviors. Healing is framed as correction: fix the thought, adjust the behavior, medicate the symptom.
Interpersonal Neurobiology (IPNB) invites something entirely different. It asks us to frame things through the lens of relationship and context. Instead of asking “What’s wrong with you?” it asks, “What happened to you, and what did your nervous system have to do to survive?”
IPNB views the mind as an emergent process shaped by experience, relationships, and the state of the nervous system, not a static set of traits or disorders.
The mental illness industry positions the clinician as the expert who assesses and treats. IPNB positions healing as a relational process, where safety, co-regulation, and presence are central. It honors that healing happens not in isolation but in connection, and that the nervous system naturally moves toward regulation and integration when given the right environment. Real recovery requires not fixing people but understanding them in context, respecting their survival, and creating the conditions for thriving.
The mental illness industry pathologizes distress, while IPNB contextualizes it.
Where the mental illness industry focuses on controlling symptoms, IPNB focuses on supporting integration.
While the mental illness industry fragments people into diagnoses, IPNB seeks to support their bodies’ inherent capacity for wholeness and health through connection, safety, and presence.
This post includes content generated by ChatGPT, a language model developed by OpenAI. The AI-generated content has been reviewed and edited for accuracy and relevance.
